Home
Who we are
What we do
Newsletter
Walking tours
Buildings saved and lost
Membership info
Contact us
Heritage Links
Site guiide

Free email updates


 

Update and Campaign Archive


February 27, 2004

I have today written to all members of Heritage Ottawa on the effect of Ottawa City budget suts on heritage. It is reproduced below.

I have also today written to the Mayor and all City Councillors describing the views of Heritage Ottawa on this issue, and calling on them to oppose the proposed crippliung cuts to Ottawa's heritage programming. You can read it here.

- David Flemming

February 27, 2004

Dear Heritage Ottawa Member:

The 2004 City of Ottawa Draft Budget recommends the overall reduction of the city’s heritage budget by 80% and completely eliminates support for the operation of museums and the grant program for historical and heritage operations like Heritage Ottawa. The total elimination of our City of Ottawa grant will result in the closing of our office, the reduction of our ability to publish our Newsletter, and will seriously limit our ability to educate and advocate on behalf of our built heritage.

If we are to prevent this from happening, it is imperative that you write or contact the Mayor and Councillors expressing your support for the City’s arts and heritage programs in general and specifically expressing your support for the work of Heritage Ottawa.

In your letter, you may wish to make the following points:

• Heritage Ottawa has been in the forefront of the preservation and protection of Ottawa’s built heritage for over 30 years

• We led the fight to save numerous heritage buildings including the East Block, the Byward Market area, the Rideau Street Convent Chapel, Wallis House and the Aberdeen Pavilion

• We were instrumental in convincing the Province of Ontario to proclaim the Ontario Heritage Act and establish Local Architectural Conservation Advisory Committees (LACAC)

• We contribute to public awareness of our built heritage through our publications, walking tours, lectures, workshops and our enhanced website and electronic archives

• We support and promote the City’s program of designating and protecting examples of our built heritage and advocate for this before LACAC and Standing Committees of Council

• The work of Heritage Ottawa is even more crucial now that the City has adopted an Official Plan which both promotes the intensification of development in areas where urban services already exist, while at the same time making this development compatible with existing neighbourhoods

• Financial support from the City of Ottawa enhances the promotion and protection of our built heritage by Heritage Ottawa volunteers and enables Heritage Ottawa to leverage funds for this purpose from other levels of government and other sources

Please e-mail, write or call the Mayor and your Councillor. Please do it NOW!!


Yours sincerely,

David B. Flemming,
President

Mayor and City Councillors contact info

Send an email to Mayor and All City Councillors

 

February 16, 2004

(The remarks below were delivered today by Heritage Ottawa President David Flemming to the Heritage Day reception at Ottawa City Hall.)

Heritage workers and volunteers, honoured guests, your worship and members of council. I am here today representing the Strong Voice for Heritage Coalition of the Council of Heritage Organizations in Ottawa / le Conseil des organismes de partiomoine d’Ottawa.

Today we celebrate our proud Canadian heritage as manifested here in the City of Ottawa, our Nation’s Capital. At this year’s Heritage Day ceremony, we are showcasing aspects our of military history. The military conjures up qualities such as courage, defence of our way of life and loyalty, qualities that are sadly lacking among most of our current municipal politicians.

L’historie militaire évoque les qualities comme le courage, la défense de notre qualité de la vie et loyauté. Malheursement, B Ottawa en deux milles quatre, ces qualités n’exist plus avec notre maire et nos conseilles. We have a municipal government that does not have the courage to espouse a vision for our City beyond what can be found on a property tax bill and who are threatening to destroy our quality of life for the sake of political opportunism.

As we enter the year leading up to the 150th anniversary of the City of Ottawa, the destruction of our City’s arts and heritage programs and services appears to be all-encompassing and almost complete. Le budget préliminaire de deux milles quatre d’Ottawa aboutira B la fermeture de nos musées, la cessation de financement des sociétés historiques et les projets patrimoniaux uniques, et la cessation de financement des grandes foires et les événements spéciaux commes Portes Ouverte Ottawa.

A cut of over 80% of the City’s cultural budget eliminates our museums, reduces our Archives, eliminates our heritage services and programs and seriously impedes our ability to protect our built heritage.

The $1.8 million that the City spends on heritage institutions and activities, supports thousands of hours of volunteer work within the community and enables our museums, archives, and historical and heritage societies to leverage tens of thousands of dollars in grants from other levels of government and the private sector. Without this seed money from the City this will not be possible. Le budget de patrimoine serve comme un investissement qui attire des investissment plus grand que l’original.

And so, after these cuts, all that will be left are a few Archives staff and the volunteers, many of whom are here today. Les bénévoles contribuent de notre pâtrimoine pour le bien-Ltre de notre ville. These are your heritage volunteers. They are not the developers who give $750 to the campaigns of municipal politicians; they are not the people who go to the $100 a plate Chamber of Commerce luncheons to hear you speak, the price of which they can write off as a business expense . They are the people who show their dedication and loyalty to their community by giving of their time and effort. These people your worship, have been listing the numbers of hours that each volunteered for the City in 2003 and I am proud to report that the 79 heritage volunteers who registered here today, have donated over 45,000 hours of service to the heritage community. At $17.00 per hour this is worth over $ 765,000 to the City. And remember, only a few of the hundreds of volunteers are here with us today. And what is the City proposing to give them in return for their efforts? Fifty-seven cents, cinquante-sept sous , is the per-capita contribution that the City will give for culture in the proposed budget.

Here today also, are the professional heritage staff who work for the City and in our museums and archives. If the draft budget is approved, most of them will be laid off by the end of March.

We also have with us today a number of Museums Studies students from Algonquin College. Ces étudiants sont le future de la preservation de notre patrimoine. With these budget cuts, these students will be deprived of opportunities to undertake community museum workplace assignments in Ottawa. And your worship, to talk in the language that many of your colleagues might understand, these 100 students bring with them Ontario transfer payments from the Ministry of Education amounting to $800,000.

On the east coast of Nova Scotia, the town of Canso lies on the far easternmost point of land on continental North America. For over 500 years, Canso has been a fishing port and over the years the community has seen some tough times, especially in the past few years with periodic closings of the fish plant and the decline of the fish stocks. Despite the hardships, the Town of Canso with a population of 900, one of the poorest towns in the country, contributes to an award-winning cultural event held each July, Stanfest, a cultural festival inspired by the music of the late Stan Rogers. They contribute more than 57 cents per capita to culture. Perhaps you, the Mayor of one of the wealthiest cities in Canada should call Mayor Frank Fraser of Canso and seek his advice on the proper stewardship of our City’s culture.

Two years ago we began work on an Official Plan for the City along with a number of subsidiary plans, including the Arts and Heritage Plan. At that time we told you of our vision for arts and heritage and you seemed to have agreed. In January, you asked us again, and again we told you. You and your colleagues seemed to ignore the Plan almost from the time that you approved it. During January’s consultations we were branded by some of your Council colleagues as "special interest groups", as if our view were somehow not as worthy as those of the "silent majority" whose desire for a continuing tax freeze seemed to coincide with that of you and most of your Council colleagues. Did you listen? I guess but you still allowed City staff to propose an 82% reduction in the cultural budget, a reduction out of all proportion to its share of the total City budget.

Mayor Chiarelli, we don’t want to live in Jan Harder’s Ottawa; it is a mean-spirited place and its only visionaries are those who can’t see beyond their property tax bill. We shall continue to share with you our vision for Ottawa over the next five weeks and offer our suggestions on how the City can operate , more effectively and hope that at the end of this process, most of these programs will be restored. If not, your only legacy as a supporter of the arts may be the answer to a question on some future Great Ottawa Heritage Day Quiz: "What Mayor presided over the destruction of the City of Ottawa’s cultural programs in 2004?" And there will not be a multiple-choice answer.

We are going to mourn and protest now with a moment of silence. Please stand and hold your copy of the Arts & Heritage Plan on high as your placard. Nous pleurons la mort de la direction politique , a tué par l’opportuisme politique, et nous pleurons la perte de nos museés, et nos programs et traivailleurs patrimionial. We mourn the death of political leadership at the hands of political opportunism; we mourn the loss of our heritage resources and we mourn the loss of so many excellent heritage colleagues. A moment of silence, un moment de silence, s’il vous plait.

Thank you, merçi beaucoup.

February 3, 2004

Urgent Meeting on Thursday, Feb. 12

I have received the notice below from the Council of Heritage Organizations in Ottawa about a crucial meeting about the City's planned cutbacks to programs, and the danger to our Heritage.

I would invite all people interested in saving our heritage to attend this important meeting.

Sincerely,
David Flemming

Calling all heritage advocates!

CHOO/COPO URGENT MEETING

Join us for a presentation on
City Council’s 2004 draft budget:

• Proposed Budget Cuts
• Public Consultation Schedule
• Response Strategies
• Walk-Through of Public Documentation and Information

Act now or your heritage will be history!

Thursday February 12th, 2004 at 7 P.M.
Tom Brown Arena
141Bayview Road (Scott and Bayview)
FREE PARKING Map

More information:

Universal Program Review

CHOO/COPO Position Paper - The Case for Preserving and Enhancing City Support for Local Heritage

January 21, 2004

Dear Supporter of Ottawa’s Heritage:

As you probably know, the City of Ottawa is facing a serious budget shortfall for 2004. Yet, the municipal budget is not just about dollars and cents. It’s about your quality of life and about life in your community.

Citizens are integral to setting the City's budget. Your Mayor and City Councillors have requested that you provide input on the development of the 2004 budget. This is your opportunity to have your voice heard on the spending of municipal funds.

To deliver a balanced budget, a Universal Program Review (UPR) was conducted by City staff to describe the impacts of a 5, 10, 15, 20 and 100% reduction on all City’s services and programs.

City taxes have not increased in over a decade, reducing the availability of municipal funding as the City continues to grow. The heritage community has not recovered from the $1 million that was cut from municipal funding of heritage and arts in the 1990’s.

A 20% reduction in municipal support for local heritage could mean:

  • The loss of Doors Open Ottawa funding;
  • Closure of two City-owned museums;
  • The loss of irreplaceable historic records due to the elimination of the City Archives conservation budget;
  • The loss of support for community-led heritage projects;
  • A reduction in programs, operating hours, and services offered by community-owned museums and heritage organizations such as historical societies.

This 20% reduction will also result in the loss of valued volunteers, fewer training opportunities for youth and fewer learning opportunities for students of all ages.

City Council wants to know how you, as residents and taxpayers, want your municipal funding spent. Council also wants to know your vision for Ottawa now and in the future.

If your vision of Ottawa is a city rich in culture, preserved history, personality and unique identity -- one that thrives on creativity and a higher quality of life – make your voice heard.

Tell your Councillor what you want your city to be for you, your children, and your community. E-mail, write, phone, or fax your Councillor today.

If you don’t know the name of your Councillor, contact the City’s main switchboard at 580-2400, or use the city's web site to locate your ward and Councillor.

You can also contact the City’s budget office directly at:

Phone: 580-2628 (TTY: 580-2401)
Fax: 560-1310
E-mail: budget@ottawa.ca
Surface Mail :
Budget Office
Financial Services Branch,
Ottawa City Hall
110 Laurier Avenue West
Ottawa, ON K1P 1J1

You will find a standard statement of support for protected heritage and cultural funding below. Please feel free to use or adapt this document when e-mailing, writing, or faxing your Councillor.

If you would like to be even more involved in the development of the 2004 budget, you can attend one of several public consultation sessions being held by Council members. Some of the sessions are led by City Councillors. They are another opportunity to voice your concerns about Ottawa’s budget and future.

Act now or your heritage will be history!

Yours sincerely

David B. Flemming,
President, Heritage Ottawa


(Sample letter)

Dear Councillor _________________________:

I am writing to you to express my deep concern over the future of Ottawa’s cultural identity. My vision for Ottawa is a city rich in cultural influences, creative expression, and heritage preservation.

City Council must live up to its responsibilities for the city’s heritage resources as anticipated in the recently approved Official Plan. We must protect our museums, archives, and heritage programs.

Heritage stewardship by the City of Ottawa is important to the quality of life and the fostering of liveable communities. Heritage programming is a core and valued city service. The money that the City spends on cultural activities and programs generates hundreds of hours of volunteer efforts by the people of Ottawa.

While I recognize that City Council faces difficult decisions in reducing the 2004 budget, heritage funding must at least continue at its current level to develop and enhance heritage programming as conceived by Ottawa 20/20, the Official Plan, and the Arts and Heritage Master Plan.

I strongly request that you protect the already under-funded heritage programs when you approve the 2004 budget. It is important to me that I live in a City that appreciates, supports, and encourages my cultural development and the quality of life in my community.

Best regards,

Name: ___________________________

Phone: ___________________________

 

December 30, 2003

Please note these City of Ottawa meetings concerning the City's Universal Program Review (UPR). Plan to attend the one in your Ward and speak-out in support of the City's heritage programs.

Also, don't forget to send a letter to your councillor and the Mayor emphasizing your support for these programs, as I suggested in my previous posting.

Happy New Year!!

- David B Flemming

Dec. 24, 2003

Last Saturday, we mailed off 170 copies of the Volume 30, No. 4, (December 2003) issue of Heritage Ottawa Newsletter. This is the first time since 1988 - 15 years ago - that we have published four issues of our Newsletter in a single year. Many thanks to Jim Georgiles, Carolyn Quinn and Gordon Cullingham for making this possible.

Heritage Ottawa requires more "active" members if we are to sustain and expand our activities in support of Ottawa's built heritage. We especially need volunteer help in developing and implementing our public lectures and walking tours as well as in the areas of membership services and development. If you wish to join Heritage Ottawa, or want to volunteer, check here for details, or call the office at 230-8841 and leave a message or e-mail me at info@heritageottawa.org

Among the items of interest in this issue of the Newsletter is the President's Report which includes suggestions on how to respond to the City's Universal Program Review (UPR). These are critical days for the heritage preservation movement in Ottawa. The UPR threatens the already-modest budget of the Heritage Services and Heritage Development Divisions which could result in a reduction in the grant program for arts and heritage organizations and activities within the City.

It is essential that each of us who feel that heritage preservation in Ottawa is important, write to the Mayor and their ward Councillor and stress the importance of these programs for the well-being of all Ottawans. In composing your remarks, you may also wish to consult a document prepared by CHOO/COPO entitled The Case for Preserving and Enhancing City Support for Local Heritage.

Firm but politely worded letters or e-mails (letters get more attention) should be sent to the Mayor and your individual Councillor at the addresses noted at:
http://www.city.ottawa.on.ca/city_council/councillors_en.html

The programs and services that will survive the UPR are those which members of Council perceive are the most important to their constituents, the electors. If they receive few letters of support for arts and heritage programs, you can be certain that they will be reduced.

The survival of our City's heritage is in your hands.

Merry Christmas, Happy New Year and Season's Greetings!!

- David B Flemming

Dec. 20, 2003

This morning, Gordon Cullingham and I mailed off 170 copies of Volume 30, No. 4, (December 2003) issue of Heritage Ottawa Newsletter. This is the first time since 1988 - 15 years ago - that we have published four issues of our Newsletter in a single year. Many thanks to Jim Georgiles, Carolyn Quinn and Gordon Cullingham for making this possible. Heritage Ottawa requires more "active" members if we are to sustain and expand our activities in support of Ottawa's built heritage. We especially need volunteer help in developing and implementing our public lectures and walking tours as well as in the areas of membership services and development. If you wish to get involved please call the office at 230-8841 and leave a message or e-mail me at info@heritageottawa.org

Among the items of interest in this issue of the Newsletter is your President's Report which includes suggestions on how to respond to the City's Universal Program Review (UPR). These are critical days for the heritage preservation movement in Ottawa. The UPR threatens the already-modest budget of the Heritage Services and Heritage Development Divisions which could result in a reduction in the grant program for arts and heritage organizations and activities within the City.

It is essential that each of us who feel that heritage preservation in Ottawa is important, write to the Mayor and their ward Councillor and stress the importance of these programs for the well-being of all Ottawans. In composing your remarks, you may also wish to consult a document prepared by CHOO/COPO entitled The Case for Preserving and Enhancing City Support for Local Heritage which can be found at:

http://www.choocopo.ca/english/index.html

Firm but politely worded letters or e-mails (letters get more attention) should be sent to the Mayor and your individual Councillor at the addresses noted at:
http://www.city.ottawa.on.ca/city_council/councillors_en.html

The programs and services that will survive the UPR are those which members of Council perceive are the most important to their constituents, the electors. If they receive few letters of support for arts and heritage programs, you can be certain that they will be reduced.

The survival of our City's heritage is in your hands.

Merry Christmas, Happy New Year and Season's Greetings!!

- David B. Flemming

Dec 3, 2003

Further to Heritage Ottawa Update on November 29 (below) Ottawa City Council, at their meeting this afternoon, defeated an amendment to the Council Governance Review: 2003-2006 Council which would have permitted the Heritage Advisory Committee to continue as a separate committee and not have its responsibilities amalgamated with those of the Arts Advisory Committee, in a new Arts, Heritage and Culutural Advisory Committee.

The amendment to the motion was narrowly lost by a vote of 10 in favour, 12 opposed. I guess the Councillors didn't hear from enough of us in support of the continuation of the Heritage Advisory Committee!

- David B. Flemming

Nov. 29, 2003

At next Wednesday's City Council meeting (December 3 at 1:30 pm), Council will be considering and approving a document entitled: Council Governance Review - 2003-2006 Council. This report, presented by Acting City Manager, Steve Kanellakos, contains recommendations relating to the operation of Council and its standing committees and to the City's various advisory committees.

One of the report's recommendations is that the Arts Advisory Committee and Heritage Advisory Committee, both be disbanded to be replaces by a nine-person Arts, Heritage and Cultural Adfvisory Committee. Heritage Ottawa does not support this recommendation.

The two exisiting committees have been working well and both have been keen advocates on behalf of their respective communities and have provided Council with reasoned advice on arts and heritage matters in Ottawa. To combine these functions into one, nine-person committee is not in the best interests of either the arts or heritage communities or the citizens of Ottawa. This was tried ten years ago and it did not work.

In a city which spends less per capita on cultural activity than other comparable cities across the country, the existence of two advisory committees to deal with heritage and the arts is essential. I urge each of you to write to the Mayor and your member of Council recommending the action as outlined in my letter to them, copied below.

For your information, the City of Ottawa website has yet to post the names and the addresses of the six new Councillors elected in this month's municipal election. I did however, send my letter to them at the addresses noted below and none were returned:

Ward 4 (Kanata) Peggy Feltmate Peggy.Feltmate@ottawa.ca

Ward 5 (West Carleton) Eli El-Chantiry
Eli.El-Chantiry@ottawa.ca

Ward 12 (Rideau-Vanier) Georges Bédard
Georges.Bedard@ottawa.ca

Ward 14 (Somerset) Diane Holmes
Diane.Holmes@ottawa.ca

Ward 16 (River) Maria McRae
Maria.McRae@ottawa.ca

Ward 19 (Cumberland) Rob Jellett
Rob.Jellett@ottawa.ca

The e-mail addresses and telephone numbers of the returning Councillors can be found on the City of Ottawa website:
http://ottawa.ca/city_council/councillors_en.html

This is the first of many challenges being faced by the arts and heritage communities in Ottawa as we embark on the Universal Program Review; more about that in the next Heritage Ottawa Update.

- David B. Flemming

(copy of letter)

November 29, 2003

Your Worship & Members of Council:

Next week you will be considering the Council Governance Review - 2003-2006 Council which contains recommendations that will determine the operation of City government for the next three years.

Among the recommendations that you will consider is one which calls for the dissolution of both the Heritage Advisory Committee and the Arts Advisory Committee, to be replaced by a nine-person Arts, Heritage and Cultural Advisory Committee. The Council Governance Review suggests that the amalgamation of the duties of two committees will result in a significant saving for the City. May I suggest that such a saving will not replace the diligence and hard work undertaken by these two committees over the past three years.

Also, the challenges to the heritage and arts communtities, while similar in their vulnerability to budget cuts, are very different in the communities which they represent. The Heritage Advisory Committe (HAC) is one of the busiest of the City's advisory committees and their 15 members have worked hard in dealing with the many threats to our municipal heritage. They have also been pro-active in attempting to educate the public on a wide range of important heritage issues from the development of the LeBreton Flats to the new Arts & Heritage Plan. To ask nine people, from various backgrounds to deal with both the arts and heritage communities is unrealsitic and does nothing to assure the people of Ottawa that the interests of both will be well represented. Combining arts and heritage into one advisory group was attempted ten years ago and, by all accounts, it did not work.

I therefore urge you to amend the Council Governance Review to permit the continuation of both committees. Rest assured that the money spent will be more than replenished by the sound guidance and advice given to you and municipal staff by these two groups.

Yours sincerely,
David B. Flemming,
President, Heritage Ottawa